Menu

10 Tragic typefaces

This week has been a pretty busy week for me grading and every semester it seems that I tend to repeat myself over and over as I critique and grade projects, “make better type choices” . So it’s time I make a stand and warn all of you of a few typefaces which I believe to be a tragic addition to just about any design. So if you know what’s good for you, I’d suggest that you please resist the urge to use the following fonts.

comicsans.jpg
So we’ll begin with one of the most well known tragic typefaces. Let’s face it, this font was only cool when the Beanie Babies were the fad. But yes, believe it or not I see students every semester make the tough decision to use comic sans – even worse is when it’s in all caps or styled with a rainbow gradient. The only cool use of comic sans I’ve seen to date is Garrett Burtoft’s Comic Sans Typography Poster, “The Abominable Comic Sans” – which is a great spoof about the typeface. The type is that disliked that there’s even a web site about banning comic sans

papyrus.jpg
You might think that papyrus is cool, but really I must tell you the truth – the papyrus font is about as outdated as the paper. Let’s face it, it’s one of the more stylized default fonts so everyone has decided it is cool enough to grace their designs.

myriad.jpg
Yes, you know you’ve used Myriad. You know Myriad…the default font for Adobe. If you are trying to be creative and unique it would be wise to use something other than the default font. When I grade and see Myriad I often think students merely didn’t even take time to consider typography. Not to say Myriad is a bad font – but as Barbara jokingly said in the lab just yesterday, if you really feel Myriad is going to benefit your design you should prepare to write a three page paper justifying how it compliments your design. Let’s face it, it doesn’t! I assure you that there are much nicer sans serif fonts out there!

mistral.jpg
One thing’s for sure – I’d be happy if I never saw the font mistral again. Most people who choose mistral seem to do so because they want a more personal handwriting style in their type choice or they just think it looks cool. Just realize it’s overused – and that’s just more of a reason to NOT use mistral.

brush-script.jpg
So you’re looking for a script font – well, brush script is NOT the one to use. Again, it’s overused, enough said.

sand.jpg
Sand is another font I see often when someone is trying to give the sense of handwriting or kids writing. If you are trying for that style, I promise you that there are more unique fonts that exist than sand.

marker-felt.jpg
I’d have to say that Marker felt ranks right up there with comic sans. Sure it looks like a marker, but that doesn’t make it cool. And it likely won’t make your design any better.

chalkboard.jpg
So you’ve heard of the negativity about comic sans and you try really hard not to use it – well, please let me warn you that chalkboard is not a good alternative. Chalkboard is like the sibling to comic sans – therefore it should be banned too.

lucida-cal.jpg
Calligraphy is cool, right? Umm. No – I’ve seen it overused and to be honest the stylistic calligraphy letterforms really won’t make your design unique.

impact.jpg
I must take a stand against the font impact. If you want to make an impact, sure impact might do just that – but it will also overwhelm and outweight all other elements on your page. It’s a big, bold, fat font that has been used way too many times. You’ll find a number of other font families that can give you the bold presence, and much, much more! If you want to make a sincere design impact – don’t use impact!

One thing to note about all of the above fonts is that they are all default system fonts. This means that just about all computer users likely have these same exact fonts. This means just about anyone with little or no knowledge of design is out there claiming to be capable of designing fliers, posters, and other projects – with these same exact typefaces. My advice, resist the urge to use these tragic typefaces.

Feel free to add to the list of tragic typefaces by posting a comment. What typefaces do you wish would rest in peace to never be used again?

[digg=http://digg.com/design/10_Tragic_typefaces]

Categories:   general info

Comments

  • Posted: October 13, 2006 20:45

    Kevin M. Scarbrough

    While I mean no disrespet to the late, great Paul Renner, futura in body copy burns my eyes. It is too geotmetric for my taste.
  • Posted: October 13, 2006 21:47

    Cliff Manspeaker

    Another blog shares the same sentiments but only stopped at 7. http://lmnop.blogs.com/lauren/2006/10/americas_most_f.html
  • Posted: October 13, 2006 22:29

    amandakern

    Thanks Cliff - I totally agree that the fonts on that list should be added. So please also resist the urge to use: Bradley Hand ITC Curlz MT (or anything with MT following it, because you know it's more than likely default too) Vivaldi (sure it's scripty but who can read it?) Kristen ITC (I mean really - is that really that close to kids handwriting?) Viner Hand ITC - this one I personally haven't seen as often but I see the point made in the link above.
  • Posted: October 14, 2006 02:10

    Chris Anemone

    I agree with all of those except Myriad. Considering it's almost nearly identical to Frutiger you might as well just make the jump and say that's bannable face as well. Myriad does have it's uses. It is a very subtle font that still looks fresh when used in a, ahem, myriad of different types of design. It is very clean cut and is a great fit for any type of corporate design. And, as it comes with some lovely OpenType features that I have yet to see incorporated into a version of Frutiger, I for one will continue using it where I feel it's appropriate.
  • Posted: October 14, 2006 03:52

    accommodated

    hehe i always thought sand looked as if the type was melting and i dont really think that's what that typeface was intended to look like... I must agree with things said about impact but I am still guilty of using and *ahem* liking it. yes, yes... i will give everyone my address so you can come and shoot me =P
  • Posted: October 14, 2006 10:53

    Jeremy Carrus

    I agree with most of these, but I too am guilty of Impact, but I swear I was young... I needed the money. I really was, it was the start of my design career when I used to work for a company that did mostly car ads. I am ashamed but I do not regret the speed I picked up from doing production work on car ads. I actually used Chalk Board as well, however it was for an interactive thing... and I was in a huge rush and fonts were slim at the time. I agree with all of these. I think most people are going to have to learn in good time when to move on and pick a better font. Especially students. I am pretty sure we are all guilty of one of them some time in our life.
  • Posted: October 14, 2006 10:56

    Jeremy Carrus

    On another note... just looking back at the time people submitted their responses... you can totally tell we are all way to much into what we do.
  • Posted: October 14, 2006 11:27

    amandakern

    @ Chris - yes Myriad isn't the worst font in the world - but lets face it, in the last year it's gotten the reputation Helvetica once had. I remember when I first started school I was told to use Helvetica was a sin. So I don't want to render it useless - just be prepared to provide a nice explanation if you intend to use it because it might just seem like you didn't even attempt to choose another font, merely because it's the default for all of Adobe's programs. And Jeremy, Yes I totally agree - I don't think there's a single person who can admit to never using one of the above listed fonts. Again, they are the default system fonts so what's great is that they're free - but what's bad is that everyone is using them - even those who aren't designers. So we tend to see more bad uses than good. Just expect all the good resources to soon follow...... Oh, and by the way - yes, we now know those that are posting, especially at the wee hours of the morning or on the weekend are passionate about what they do. Or as some of my students were joking in the lab Friday, we could be dubbed graphic design "geeks" right. :o) That counts for some TVCA points right? :o)
  • Posted: October 14, 2006 23:52

    Tysonr

    Ha ha, well Amanda let me apologize if I was ever one of those students you had whom which made you shake your head in typographic dismay. I can't remember using any of those fonts recently but I too HAVE used some in the past, for sure. Our teachers here do a pretty good job of ingraining good typography choices in our heads, so once you get to Advanced Graphic Design 1 or Advanced Web Design I would hope you are not seeing any of those typefaces anymore!
  • Posted: October 15, 2006 09:51

    amandakern

    Yes Tyson, knowing is half the battle. :)
  • Posted: October 15, 2006 13:07

    eddie misicka

    The ban comic sans website is awesome. I found it a couple months ago and started spreading the word. A type apostle if you will. I agree with the list big time. I did a piece last fall and used myriad and it was the first thing everyone jumped on. I defended it, and was agreed with. So there is some good in this world...of type.
  • Posted: October 15, 2006 14:29

    Barbara Peterson

    I love the exchange and yes, possibly we all need to get a life if we get so emotional about a typeface. I have my special "hate" list - any original Mac font since we only had about 10 and they were so overused. However, I had an interesting conversation with Thomas Scott - who I consider to be a type guru and the only person that was able to beat me at the How Design Conference type trivia shoot-out. He stated that we should ban students from using Avant Garde - just remove it from the font management program. I told him I felt it more important to teach them when it was appropriate and not to use certain typefaces. He laughed and said " well, I guess you are right because I happen to be using Avant Garde as we speak" I guess at times "beauty is in the eye of the typebeholder"!
  • Posted: October 15, 2006 15:33

    Stacy

    i was going to say bradley hand and curlz mt, but it was mention in a comment already. in my layout class, barbara said apple chancery is an older, default font on macs and should not be used because of it's overuse in earlier years.
  • Posted: October 15, 2006 20:58

    Chris Anemone

    Amanda: Yes, it is unfortunate that Myriad is becoming quite ubiquitous. It's one of the reasons I've been trying to force myself to not use one of my favourite faces anymore. Mrs Eaves if you're curious. Not even a couple years ago you rarely ever saw it, now it's everywhere. I'm so good at recognising it that I even noticed that it's the typeface used for the floor mosaics at Mall at Millenia! And in Savannah, where I just got back from, Mrs Eaves is the typeface used by SCAD—which I found interesting.
  • Posted: October 16, 2006 10:09

    Daissy

    Ha! How cool is this? until this point people seem to just gossip about bad use of typefaces, but nobody could just go ahead and tell the truth. Honestly, I believe that if you have a good reason for it, go ahead and show us how to use them well. However, when it comes to overused typefaces, there are many that will be banned, even the good ones. While some of us spend a lot of time finding the right typeface for the right job, some seem to ignore it completely. I guess it is part of the learning process, and cheers to those who have been guilty because it means that you learned something. It is all about experimenting, but the ones listed on these article I don't even consider them a choice...and we know why! So lets get creative and start making our own typefaces!
  • Posted: October 16, 2006 13:31

    Jeremy Perez-Cruz

    A couple of quick things: If you want to see Myriad used nicely check out any Apple ad. Admittedly, Steve Jobs had a special version created just for Apple, but it still looks sexy. I don;'t think Myriad is out for the count...yet. Chris- Mrs. Eaves is a beautiful typeface, but I have to agree it has been over extended. For a nice replacement check out the baskerville offered by the Storm Type Library. Everything offered by Storm is open type, and undoubtedly classy.
  • Posted: October 16, 2006 13:39

    Jeremy Perez-Cruz

    In addition, I highly recommend Robert Bringhurst's Elements of Typographic Style. It can be a dry read, but well worth the effort. I know more than a few designers who have it on hand at all times. It's an excellent reference tool if you are committed to beautiful, flawless typography.
  • Posted: October 16, 2006 14:55

    kpennino

    i'll second that book recommendation, jeremy. on a side note, i think it's important to mention that just about every authority on type design agrees with the majority of these statements being made. what i'm having a difficult time understanding is why are fewer and fewer people who think they want to learn about typography taking less and less time to really READ these principles?... on paper... in black and white ink... where they've always been. too many people new to design and typography think that figuring out how to apply the basics of design and typography is just going to dawn on them one day while they're clicking and dragging... just like how they figured out how to use illustrator or their favorite video games. for those who think some day you will learn to love typography by using the above mentioned approach: get out and read. read a lot. read until those letters become beautiful at 8pts. read until you can really say you LOVE this 'typography stuff' and stop pretending you do so long as you don't have to read it. :-) kristy
  • Posted: October 17, 2006 14:52

    amandakern

    You all might also enjoy the typobituaries by Daniel Mall - he's added some good ones to the list: http://www.danielmall.com/archives/2006/08/22/typobituaries.php
  • Posted: October 17, 2006 16:40

    Jason Keller

    Ummm, Beanie Babies™ were not a fad, they were a culture.As you mentioned though, "they are all default system fonts." From a true design aspect they may have become bane, but from the view of a coder would these typefaces not still hold some value in giving a rather dull sans-serif/serif web page a small splash of variation? Not saying that the entire page should be in chalkboard or brush script, but wouldn't active text be preferred over images in certain instances?
  • Posted: October 17, 2006 17:11

    amandakern

    Jason, You bring up some good points. I think if you take closer look at that list I didn't mention the common web fonts such as Verdana, Arial, or Times. And that is because you are correct, a web user must have the font installed on their system to view a web site as a designer has intended. Unless of course the designer uses images for the font, which is actually discouraged for accessibility reasons, load time, and it makes your web site less search engine friendly. Now of course there is another way to get the font you want on the web, it's a bit more technical using SIFR, which basically converts your font into Flash so that it renders how your font is suppose to look. Here's a nice example of it in action. This means they don't need the font, however, it does add to load time just as images do - but it's totally accessible. So it's okay for headlines but you probably don't want to use it for your entire web site. You guys might find this even more interesting that Andrei Herasimchuk has written a letter to the guys in charge at Adobe, Apple, and Microsoft requesting that be fonts added to the default to include Frutiger, Univers, and Franklin Gothic. This would be great for all the web designers out there. It'd be so nice to use Univers for body copy in a web page, right!? :)
  • Posted: October 17, 2006 22:20

    Kevin M. Scarbrough

    Thinking about it, I'm going to have to say the majority (if not all) "handwritten" typefaces should be on this list. - Find someone who can write with the style in which you want to use - Scan at 600 - 720 DPI - Photoshop -> Mode -> Bitmap - Insert into project with resounding love and joy
  • Posted: October 18, 2006 14:18

    Chris Anemone

    Jeremy: Yes, I have admired Storm Type for a long time. I especially love their Walbaum face.
  • Posted: October 19, 2006 23:22

    zoel

    i love HELVATICA he3x....
  • Posted: October 20, 2006 23:56

    Learn to love typography « Graphics Technology

    [...] Perhaps you’ve been neglecting a love affair with one of the most powerful elements in design: typography. That’s right – it’s time you fell in love with an element of design which will undoubtedly improve your design skills. Learning how to successfully use type doesn’t just miraculously occur as you design. As Kristy noted in her comment in the “10 Tragic Typefaces” article, “too many people new to design and typography think that figuring out how to apply the basics of design and typography is just going to dawn on them one day while they’re clicking and dragging…” Typography is often one of the biggest weaknesses of most students nearing graduation. Understanding elements that make typographic design successful is key to becoming a better designer. New media designer, Cameron Moll notes, “Typeface selection is one of the most transparent ways of detecting good — and bad — design.” [...]
  • Posted: October 23, 2006 12:00

    Jessi VanPelt

    I just spoke with the Mac Paper Rep for my company (Dahlquist Printing) and he says the Show is pretty much RSVP only. At the Rep's suggestion, I e-mailed the guy in charge of that at Mac Papers, and asked him if it would be okay if I brought my DMD students. I will keep you posted.
  • Posted: October 29, 2006 15:15

    Andres Mathews

    I complete agree with Kristy about the fonts that we shouldn't use, but also I would like to know which are the fonts that we should use insted of the fonts presented. While I was reading this article I though about the terrible mistakes that I did before using fonts such as mistral or market felt. Now I understand why garamond rocks!! jeje Now I notice the importance of networking and how helpful this kind of articles are! thank you all.
  • Posted: October 29, 2006 20:29

    amandakern

    Andres - great question. Hang tight - I'll have to keep you in suspense as I'm working that topic. So until we meet again - just keep in mind those fonts that'll likely be a tragic addition to most designs...
  • Posted: November 14, 2006 18:07

    Tragic Typefaces Revisited « VCC Graphics Technology

    [...] Hello, I’m Stacy Alberto (fellow VCC design student) - guest blogging for you today because Amanda went to rest her eyes after some students projected blinding comps for her Advanced Web Class… Just kidding, those were done as a joke. However it got me thinking about what makes bad design, and it led to this article of Tragic Typeface Alternatives, which revisits 10 Tragic Typefaces and offers more viable alternatives. [...]
  • Posted: April 10, 2007 05:18

    Russ

    Stop beating up on Helvetica... it maybe your fault. http://stbride.org/friends/conference/hiddentypography/helvetica.html "I propose an alternate way of looking at Helvetica that is less formal and more literal. If Helvetica is used to set boring words, then it’s boring. If Helvetica is used to set facist messages, then it’s facist. Divorcing form from meaning is actually a by-product of the Swiss Modernist movement. Contemporary critical discourse ought to employ more complex tools for analysis, with a stronger consideration of context. In her unorthodox solo issue of Design Quarterly, published in 1986, digital imaging pioneer April Grieman quotes the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein—ironically set in Helvetica—"if you give it a sense, it makes sense"."
  • Posted: August 29, 2007 01:10

    Blog de la clase de Tipografía 3» Blog Archive » Fontleech y otros blogs que promueven las fuentes gratuitas

    [...] este siguiente blog vccgraphics, que publica el Community College de Valencia en Orlando, Florida, nos viene un artículo sobre [...]
  • Posted: May 1, 2008 04:22

    A Plea From 16 Most Overused Fonts » Inspiration Bit

    [...] Tragic Typefaces [...]
  • Posted: January 18, 2009 23:31

    And Now for Some Bad Advice about Typography | listen to...

    [...] this list of 10 tragic typefaces is quite possibly the least informative article of [...]
  • Posted: June 9, 2009 14:14

    Joseph S.

    I'll agree with everything but the dirt on Myriad. Myriad is a good family, Robert Slimbach is a great typeface designer. Just because it's default doesn't make it bad. Especially when you don't have Helvetica up there... which is on EVERYTHING even though it isn't a default. Myriad is a good san-serif font that works where san-serif fonts work. I defend it's honor.
  • Posted: June 29, 2009 04:18

    Wouter

    I have to disagree with some of them, but more importantly I'm missing Helvetica/Arial and Times (New Roman) up there or verdana if you're going for the whole overused argument for Myriad which is always a better font to use then Helvetica.
  • Posted: September 1, 2010 15:36

    Kailand Honeck

    Another over-used font in advertising is Futura Extra-Bold. I can't tell you how many ads feature it, it's easy to see why, but unfortunately it's becoming too ubiquitous
  • Posted: December 30, 2010 14:24

    Dafont ain’t da Devil | artschoolsurvivalguide

    [...] this. When there is a bad use of a typeface and there are a lot of poorly used typefaces out there (http://vccgraphics.wordpress.com/2006/10/13/10-tragic-typefaces/) just resist temptation. KEEP LOOKING FOR THE RIGHT FONT!!! The key to any good composition is [...]
  • Posted: February 3, 2011 21:32

    Justine Greene

    For what it's worth (says the 1st year student - LOL) the Adobe default is Myriad Pro, now. I never use it, but I admit I did recently use Myriad (sans Pro ~grin~) because I wanted a typeface that felt friendly, and accessible, without being too casual; and retained complete legibility regardless of the size. I'm sure I'll be slammed for it, now, though..... ~grin~ I hasn't seen this "tragedy" list, at that point, but I know - ignorance isn't an excuse. But now I know. And, as GI Joe said, knowing is half the battle. ~grin~