Menu

Tragic Typefaces Revisited

Hello, I’m Stacy Alberto (fellow VCC design student) – guest blogging for you today because Amanda went to rest her eyes after some students projected blinding comps for her Advanced Web Class… Just kidding, those were done as a joke. However it got me thinking about what makes bad design, and it led to this article of Tragic Typeface Alternatives, which revisits 10 Tragic Typefaces and offers more viable alternatives.

Tragic Typeface Alternatives
For those of you insisting on using atrocious fonts such as Comic Sans, Impact, Papyrus, Brush Script, and the like, read the reasons why they are bad. Then, consider using the suggested alternatives.

First, most of these fonts are commonly used with Microsoft software. If you use Microsoft to design anything, don’t expect to be taken seriously by the design industry. (We use Macs in the lab for a reason.) Also, these fonts are popular among non-designers because they’re so easily accessible on Microsoft computers. Remember, you do not want to associate your professional design with a font that is commonly used for MySpace graphics or school newsletters.

Using these fonts will not win you any awards. Note the typefaces used in AIGA’s design archives. Research Typographic Design and you’ll be hard-pressed to find anyone using a Microsoft-based font.

Here are some side-by-side comparisons of fonts that you should avoid at all costs, along with a more viable alternative.

Comic Sans
Comic Sans is frequently used by non-designers. It has quirky, irregular strokes, but not irregular enough to look like true handwriting. Do NOT replace Comic Sans with a similar font like Chalkboard or Marker Felt. That’s like trading a Wal-mart shirt for a K-mart one and expecting it to fit better. AlphaMack AOE is a novelty font that has a more realistic handwritten look.

comicsans.gif

Bradley Hand ITC
This is a handwritten font that is frequently used among amateur designers (a.k.a. student designers breaking out of their Comic Sans phase). Use something like Caflisch Script if you want a more elegant handwritten effect.

bradleyhand1.gif

Papyrus
Popular among amateur and non-designers and because of its distinctive characteristics including calligraphic strokes and distressed edges. When a novelty font is “played out”, it loses its appeal and you’re better off not using it ever again. Optima offers similar unique strokes without calling too much attention to itself.

papyrus.gif
Brush Script
Just because it has “script” in the name doesn’t mean it should be used on a wedding invitation.
Savoy LET and Edwardian Script offer more elegant alternatives.

brushscript.gif
Herculanum
Originally based on Roman capital letterforms, Herculanum lacks elegance because of its novelty, handwritten-like strokes. Trajan is a much more elegant typeface that will give that same powerful Roman empire effect.

herculanum.gif

Courier, Courier New
Courier is a system font, used when your original font is missing or unavailable. Do NOT ever use system fonts in design (includes Andale Mono, Monaco, Chicago and most fonts with city names). Using it in a design says, “My font defaulted and I am an incompetent designer because of it.” If you want that “type” look, use AmericanTypewriter, Rockwell, or Lubalin Graph. The kerning of these fonts have better aesthetics than monospaced system fonts.

courier.gif

Impact
Do not use Impact if you want to make an impact. It is a distorted, “squished” typeface – note the flat dotted “i” and the angles on the “x”. Use Helvetica Neue Condensed Black – the typeface is more open for breathing room and readability.

impact.gif

Times New Roman
Times New Roman in itself is not a bad font, but it’s also considered a default font. Default fonts say “I’m too lazy to pick a font”. Despite similar appearances, not all serif typefaces are the same. Using Baskerville or Caslon will show that you’ve made a conscious effort to choose a typeface. If you can’t tell the difference, note the highlighted areas to compare the subtle differences.

times.gif

times2.gif

A reminder on using fonts appropriately

  • Novelty fonts should enhance a piece; it should not be the design’s main focus
  • Don’t use novelty or capitalized fonts as body copy
  • Don’t use script fonts in all caps

Other Great Typefaces
The following typefaces have stood the test of time and are great for “everyday” use because of its strong typographical qualities.

Serif

  • Bembo
  • Bodoni
  • Century Schoolbook
  • Cheltenham
  • Goudy
  • Palatino

Sans-serif

  • Gil Sans
  • Franklin Gothic
  • Futura
  • Univers

Search Fonts.com and Linotype.com for more info on these great fonts. Typography classes can teach you what is a serif, stroke, counter, etc., but it’s up to your discretion to decide when a serif, stroke, or counter is used appropriately. When it comes down to it, don’t use fonts that are used by unprofessionals. Search for new typefaces that will make your project innovative and fresh.

If you have any more typeface alternatives, post them here.
If you are a defender of Comic Sans or Papyrus, give us your two cents!
We might still think you’re crazy, but we’re willing to listen 🙂

Categories:   general info

Comments

  • Posted: November 14, 2006 18:33

    kurt

    Nice Stacey, I give you 2 kudos. But seriously, I learned a lot reading this, thanks a bunch.
  • Posted: November 14, 2006 18:57

    amandakern

    Thanks again Stacy. Oh, my head is still spinning from those hilarious Advanced web concepts. And I think all of the instructors agree that we say these things over and over and over again in class, during presentations, and in grading. Obviously these things can't be said enough! So you all should go pound these thoughts into your noggin now so they become instinctual. :)
  • Posted: November 14, 2006 21:17

    Daissy

    This is really going to help a lot of us as a quick cheat sheet in case of emergency! Thanks!
  • Posted: November 14, 2006 23:10

    Barbara Peterson

    Great article. I'm going to make required reading for my Digital Media and Design class. Are you available for a testimony?
  • Posted: November 15, 2006 10:42

    Colette

    Great job Stacy! My experience online working mainly in the online capacity I continue to bump heads with the boss stressing how we need more MAC/Open Type fonts. He insists that the 2k I have on the PC will work for everything. I commonly use Franklin Gothic, Futura, Helvetica, Palatino and Edwardian as these are readily available on both platforms.
  • Posted: November 19, 2006 22:16

    Stacey

    I enjoyed your article, great advice. I am guilty of using a few of those fonts and will make note to not do so in the future! Thanks
  • Posted: November 21, 2006 14:55

    Stacy Alberto

    Barbara, what's a testimony? Well, I know what it is, but what exactly do you mean by it? I got an idea for your Digital Media class - or any class! -- make them write a 1-page paper (in 12pt type or less) on why they want to use any of the typefaces listed above, just like you threatened us with if we ever used Myriad :)
  • Posted: November 22, 2006 22:16

    Justin OOOO

    tragic typefaces, sure. but we should visit "ten terriable design cliches" which could include: Barcodes, in a word "lame" using barcodes are lame gradients(more than 1) unless you're on drugs, no one is going to enjoy fading from 1 to 4 colors. any picture with a moderately attractive person, and the only color in the picture are their eyes, which are so blue/green it's ridiculous. what else?
  • Posted: November 23, 2006 10:44

    Stacy Alberto

    ^ that's actually where this blog started, but I ended up going typefaces since it seems to dominate everything I was talking about. I do plan on going back to my original idea of commonly used, bad design trends. :)
  • Posted: April 11, 2007 23:43

    Russ

    I would like to recommend instead of Futura or Avant Garde, try using Avenir Next. http://www.linotype.com/2090/avenirnext.html And Frutiger Next http://www.linotype.com/53781/frutigernext-family.html?DSESSID=
  • Posted: April 22, 2007 20:24

    Max

    I have to disagree, using a 'default' font with a serious knowledge of typography, can produce some great results. for you to say that using them is lazy, just means you don't know typography at all. Good luck designing with a closed mind.
  • Posted: October 11, 2007 12:42

    James L. Greenlee

    You are spot on with your "bad fonts," but fairly snobby with your Microsoft comments. I assume you mean that PC users cannot be designers. That is insulting and untrue. I work in the sign industry, which is dominated by PC computers. When I'm supplied with art by others, none is more problematic, or contains more "cheats" than artwork from Mac artists. I'm just asking for a little fairness here--it is not the tool that is important, it is the artist. I have yet to find a task I couldn't complete, or a sign I couldn't design on my PC. I've never thrown my hands up and said, "If I only had a Mac!" And FYI, in your suggested fonts, just from personal experience, several like Helvetica, Optima, Futura and--OH MY GOD--Trajan are extremely overused, at least in signage. No slam intended, just a fact.
  • Posted: October 11, 2007 13:14

    kristy pennino

    hi james, i can understand how you might have so easily misunderstood where we were coming from here because i don't feel it was well articulated. really our hangup with many fonts is not that they're default or even that they're overused, but rather when they are used in a "default way" often by the novice designer (aka helvetica 12 pt type with 'auto' leading) and in a way that demonstrates lack of understanding for the structure of that typeface, it's limitations and how that affects its communication of a message. on a side note, there really are few fonts today that can be considered well designed by the standards set by typographers themselves. you won't find a single type designer who would argue with our primary list posted on the blog (comic sans, papyrus, et al). and for the record, helvetica is in fact a well designed typeface by the standards of most type designers and graphic designers alike, it's with the way it's USED, not designed that concerns the design community. changing the subject: i don't think a single contributor to our site has ever suggested that all is takes is a computer to be a good designer... students need to learn how to use pencils, paint, fabric, and any other tools that are just as effective to intentionally communicate a specific message to a specific audience. often times using a computer doesn't even make sense. i think our newest flickr postings clearly demonstrate my point here (especially considering they were NOT allowed to even use a computer!). and i'm sure you know the difference between a designer and someone who just knows the software (tools) so i won't go there. now as far as the computer operating system and hardware is concerned... we just prefer our students learn industry standard hardware and software to ensure they're adequately prepared for what the MAJORITY of the industry is expecting. for instance, the majority of the industry is using adobe illustrator for vector graphics, so it wouldn't make sense to teach them corel draw instead. nor would it make sense for us to train them on how to use proprietary signage software when knowing how to use that software is not an industry standard. hope this helps to clear things up, james. we are all aware that there are schools out there that do a poor job of preparing students to work in the industry by teaching them ONLY design theory/history or by teaching them ONLY technology... however, we're not one of them. :-)
  • Posted: October 25, 2007 07:22

    yeah_yeah

    What fulltime job do you have now to trade off the graphic designing. I thought your portfolio website was great, the apparel portfolio website was actually the best looking one that can get you the web/graphic designing job. But it's all good, best of luck with everything.
  • Posted: November 28, 2007 14:31

    Important Typographic Information « Ccsfashionillustration’s Weblog

    [...]  Alternatives to using the ‘forbidden fonts’ [...]