Menu

Why the world is neglecting Mac users

So the topic has sprouted up a few times the last two months about how some web sites just totally do NOT function on a Macintosh. I must admit that as a Macintosh user it’s disappointing to see how many times I am frustrated by the fact that some web sites don’t work on current Macintosh Internet browsers. I figured rather than starting out doing a ton of case studies on web sites that are clearly lacking when it comes to being usable and accessible to Macintosh users, I’d rather begin by putting this entire topic into perspective as to WHY some companies feel there’s no benefit to use technology that works on both PC and Macintosh platforms.

It’s all about numbers
Obviously, businesses like to please their customers, but they also must follow business models which are profitable. Right now, browsers statistics indicate that over 85% of the population uses a PC of some sort. Only about 4% of the population uses a Macintosh. And as much as those that have owned a Macintosh try to convince others what they’re missing out on, the truth is – it’s just easier and cheaper to own a PC.

Why 4% should matter
So companies certainly can claim that there’s no benefit to supporting Macintosh users because they are such a small fraction of the population. But in all honesty, 4% is actually a pretty big number of you think of the actual population. According to the current worldwide internet statistics, there are currently 1.1 billion total internet users. Do the math and that means there are close to 45 million Macintosh internet users. So for the thousands of web sites that don’t function on Macintosh – you’re losing out on a bigger part of the population than you realize that is as, if not more, dynamic, creative, and business minded as PC users.

Please don’t tell me the solution is use an older browser
In some cases, companies do try to remedy the situation by saying a web site will work on an older browser like Internet explorer or Netscape. In the case of Internet explorer, as popular as it might be, it currently is one the WORST internet browsers on a Macintosh. Why? Well, Microsoft not only stopped supporting it several years ago, but they have absolutely no intention to create a new browser for Macintosh. In fact, they encourage Macintosh users use the internet browser, Safari, instead. It’s also worth noting that Macintosh no longer ships with Internet explorer. On my computer every time it launches it locks up and will never open. So if a web site suggests a Macintosh User access a web site with Internet explorer, it’s highly likely that it was developed several years ago. In the case of the financial institution, Wells Fargo, they encourage users to use Netscape. Crazy, right? Which if statistics tell you anything, as of 2007 Netscape is no longer included in internet statistics. I’m still baffled why some web sites either aren’t accessible on any Macintosh internet browser OR they suggest these older browsers that are totally useless. It tells me that they either don’t have the time or knowledge to make a web site work on a Macintosh OR they merely haven’t updated their web site in years. Regardless of the excuse, it makes me wonder if companies really care about their users.

Do they really care?
Some companies do make the effort. In fact, there are a ton of web sites I use regularly that work on Macintosh browsers such as Safari or Firefox. So it’s not that it’s not possible. The questions to ask is – “Do they really care?” Most developers will claim that it’s such a pain to develop web sites for Macintosh browsers, especially those that have added functionality such as e-commerce. I know for a fact that there are millions of Macintosh users that are simply tired of the excuses and would love nothing more than be able to use some of these web sites that are currently useless to Macintosh Users.

Unfortunately this topic is certainly a huge debate between PC and Mac users. This is not a debate over Microsoft or Apple, which computer is better, or why a web site isn’t working on a certain browser. It’s a matter of making the internet more accessible to ALL web users. In my opinion, regardless of your platform, a web site should be accessible by some means with a CURRENT internet browser.

I’d certainly love to hear your thoughts on the topic.

[digg=http://www.digg.com/apple/Why_the_World_is_neglecting_Mac_users]

Categories:   Uncategorized

Comments

  • Posted: March 28, 2007 13:00

    dennis

    Do you drive a truck or a car, a motorcycle? Is it a chevy a ford or a import. How would you like to live in a world where you could only buy a hatchback gremlin and was forced to paint it avacado green. You should embrace Mac and Unix if not for the superior ethical guidelines that they use in thier buisness, then for the fact that they exist to provide choices. As for the percentage of users, lets look at what those users do with the machines. The bulk of Microsofts market is home users and teenage gamers. If you look at Apples share its industry professionals creating the world you live in. Specific tool for specific tasks and if you want to balance your checkbook, play video games and surf cooking sites then Microsoft is your box. However If you want to create, edit, package, market and change the world you live in, choose mac. I use all three. Variety is indeed the spice of life, there is a reason we have anti-trust laws on the books and reasons that there are a infinate number of lawsuits against microsoft for thier deplorable buisness tactics. Doubt me? Do a google search for Lawsuits against Microsoft. Anyone who spends even a few hours researching the numbers of software companies that have been bought out and closed down by microsoft out of fear of competition. Perfect example HALO, designed on macs for macs then shortly before release date Microsoft buys the companies, shelfs are efforts on a mac release and solely releases the title on X-Box (by the way lookinside your xbox youll be suprised to find out whats in there). If you cant compete, do a hostile take over and shut them down seems to be Microsofts answer to improving technology. Ok before I get accused of bashing and being jaded let change the direction of my comments. It is my opinion that most of the websites out there are built badly by untrained people whom refuse to learn the proper coding technuiqes to support all users and instead of paying a professional to make a fully fuctioning site they get theyre 10 year old nephew to use a shareware or prepackaged GUI to make a html 2.0 site that does not work. So blame IE or Safari or put the blame where I think it belongs, lazy out of date designers that think good enough is good enough(They wont be winning any Addys). I know, this is a long reply so let me sum it up: Learn how to design for all exisiting OS' and be prepared to learn more as technology will continue to evolve and so must we with it.
  • Posted: March 28, 2007 14:05

    kpennino

    whew! can you feel the love?! (dennis, i can just hear you saying this!)
  • Posted: March 28, 2007 14:35

    Eddie Misicka

    Yeah! Stick it to the man!
  • Posted: March 28, 2007 15:56

    Chris Anemone

    Little trick for those websites that will actually refuse to work with Safari because it's not IE6 or higher and that won't work on Firefox either: enable the hidden debug menu with either TinkerTool or through the terminal. There are options there to make Safari report that it's a different browser to the websites it visits—not permanently, just until you close the window or safari itself—and nine times out of ten when you set it to report that it's IE6 websites that require IE6 will let you through without a problem. Generally I find it best to close the window and open a new one, set Safari to IE6, then browse to the site that wouldn't let me in before. Setting it to IE6 while still on the site and just refreshing doesn't always work.
  • Posted: March 28, 2007 15:57

    Alex Seifert

    I've developed websites for several years (since the days of Netscape 4) and I have to say that developing websites, even with added functionality such as e-commerce, for the Mac is not at all a problem. I've never had any problems with it. I am a fairly recent switcher to the Mac ( I switched when OS X 10.1 was around) and have never had any problems developing sites that work on both seemlessly.
  • Posted: March 29, 2007 21:08

    Stacy Alberto

    There should be a program that simulates websites on all major browsers across all platforms, simple as that. If developing is easier, then hopefully sites would be more cross-platform compatible.
  • Posted: March 30, 2007 09:13

    Kevin M. Scarbrough

    Playing the devil's advocate (which I love to do) and sidestepping Dennis's comments (which I agree with, but they've been stated, so I shall move to a new section of discussion): If a site isn't working on a Mac, then someone isn't doing their job, and you are losing efficiency. And money. And customers. Large, robust sites are database driven. Amazon.com does not have a fleet of interns sitting in the back pumping in data into sheet templates, hurridly editing when things go on sale, ect. So, what does that mean? All of your data, every widget, has the capability to be accessible by every wireless device in the world -- THIS is why the web is so powerful. It is possible to create a separate portal for EACH and EVERY browser model available. The code to figure out what browser you are using has been readily available since I started using the internet 10 years ago! Now lets talk numbers. http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/data/html/06Q4.html (Please note, CENCUS.GOV!) "Total e-commerce sales for 2006 were estimated at $108.7 billion, an increase of 23.5 percent (±3.3%) from 2005. Total retail sales in 2006 increased 5.8 percent (±0.3%) from 2005. " Retail sales went up almost 6%, while e-commerce sales went up 23.5? So, e-commerce is growing at nearly 4 times the rate of retail sales? Taking this a bit further: 4% (estimated number of Mac users) of $108.7 billion (total e-commerce sales of 2006) = $4.348 BILLION! That is a LOT of pie to say, "Y'know what? No thanks, we have enough money. Go ahead and let our competition take it." At best, any company with a dedicated staff web developer / web agency who doesn't make your site Mac compatible is uninformed as to the SEVERE damage they are doing to your brand. At worst, they are (at the risk of sounding acidic) willfully ignorant and lazy.
  • Posted: March 30, 2007 13:13

    Daissy

    lol.
  • Posted: April 16, 2007 13:47

    Adam

    There seems to be a lot of love for mac in this room. I believe there was even an ethical statement. Business ethics you say, I'm not going to get to deep into it, but if you think Apple wants to give you a big hug, while mean ol' Microsoft is trying to rule the world, do some research. Gates donates much of his time and money in outreach efforts, Blue Cross, third world countries. Actually he is retiring to do exactly that. When he retires, statements have been made that some 16 billion dollars will be donated out of his estate for medical research. Evil, Evil Bill Gates. What has Jobs done, Disney...nice old Disney. Oh well, on topic we go. Web apps should be cross compatible, no doubt about it. But it isn't all on the developer, standard compliant browsers are still new. IE 7 has made leaps and bounds, but still not there, and IE 6 is just the worst browser available, even though it benchmarks faster than all other browsers, it just doesn't work. But most web developers use Microsoft because of the tools and data crunching power, it would make sense to test in a common browser. Only us new cats have given Firefox potential to push the 30% mark. But if you test on Safari, you might as well test on Opera. The same number of users on both. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp When was the last time you tested your site in Maxthon? You show up on Windows and Mac, but did you test on Linux? Same number of Linux users as Mac users, and you thought Linux was insignificant. Well PC users feel the same about you. Not to be rude, but it's all about numbers, Windows makes their money off of OSs, Mac makes their money off of ipods. If you spout a claim of cross compatibility, look at what you test on. Besides Dennis, who runs both sides of the OS fence, how many of you mac users test on IE 6 and IE 7. You need to PC's or a partition with duel boot. IE 5 shows more than Safari, do you test on that as well? Just a few questions to think about.
  • Posted: August 30, 2007 20:13

    Dustin

    These numbers that some of you have laid out are really very entertaining. 4% of the total Internet Users are MAC = 45 Million... pretty astounding number when you really look at it how it could affect commerce. I have to agree with this issue, but in the end there is always a solution. Out managing the situation is something we all can do, and frankly that's fine with me. The new Fusion1.0 allows a user to Expose' Windows and OSX at the same time on their MAC. (by the way show any Windows User Expose' on your MAC and they will be amazed, Windows cant even begin to imitate this) If this is as good as it gets (running a dual OS) with having a solution for now.... that's ok. The debate here is insignificant, If we have a solution.... use it. The rest of the world (Windows Users) doesn't care about the MAC product or person. My room-mate is an avid Windows User and takes any opportunity to slam my beautiful Macbook Pro. I ask myself why does he do this? If he loves his computer so much... then why should he need to bash mine? The only answer i have Amanda uses the "Grade School Bully Mentality", he and other PC Users feel intimidated by it and needs to calm their insecurities. I digress...... I really don't care what people use for a computer as long as they have one. It's part of the world now. As far as web developers go, eventually they will have a simple solution for everyone. They will have to as many are predicting that Apple's market share will grow at 2% per year going forward.
  • Posted: August 31, 2007 09:43

    Kevin M. Scarbrough

    >>The new Fusion1.0 allows a user to Expose’ Windows and OSX at the same time on their MAC. (by the way show any Windows User Expose’ on your MAC and they will be amazed, Windows cant even begin to imitate this) If this is as good as it gets (running a dual OS) with having a solution for now…. that’s ok. -- Dustin While I agree with your spirit ("Find a solution to fit you"), I disagree with the manner of your solution. The problem you pose has nothing to do with Windows or Mac, it has to do with a third party playing to one and not the other. Needlessly. There is always a point of friction between businesses and consumers. Businesses want the cash, consumers want the goods/services. The one that bends is a virtue of which side wants their share more. My point, to which you referenced, is based on the fact that I am not willing to spend money on a product to allow me to reach a certain service (purchasing emulator software). If I wanted to use Windows, I'd use Windows. Many companies have made their decision to exclude Mac, based on (in my opinion) bad advice or sheer ignorance as to their available options. To your point, there is always a solution. Mine is to use companies who allow me to use existing resources (my Mac).